International Research Journal of Commerce , Arts and Science

 ( Online- ISSN 2319 - 9202 )     New DOI : 10.32804/CASIRJ

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 5    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

CREDIT RISK METHODOLOGIES FOR FINANCIAL RISK ANALYSIS

    1 Author(s):  RISHI ARORA

Vol -  5, Issue- 12 ,         Page(s) : 119 - 123  (2014 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/CASIRJ

Abstract

Credit risk measures the possibility of a decline in an asset price resulting from a change in the credit quality of a counterparty or issuer (e.g., counterparty in an OTC transaction, issuer of a bond, reference entity of a credit default swap). Credit risk increases when the counterparty's perceived probability of default or rating downgrade increases. Five main credit risk measurement methodologies are discussed in this review .Operational risk is defined by the Basel Committee as "the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events." Thus, operational risk can result from such diverse causes as fraud, inadequate management and reporting structures, inaccurate operational procedures, trade settlement errors, faulty information systems, or natural disaster. Credit risk is the next best understood financial risk after market risk and lot of discussion is being done on market risk so we will study Credit Risk in this paper.

  1. Legal and regulatory risk is the risk of a financial loss that is the result of an erroneous application of current laws and regulations or of a change in the applicable law (such as tax law).
  2. The publication of numerous articles, working papers, and books has marked the unparalleled advances in risk management. As a general reference, the following are a few of the sources that offer thorough treatments of risk management.
  3. Das (2005) provided a general overview of the practice of risk management, mostly from the perspective of derivatives contracts.
  4. Embrechts, Frey, and McNeil (2005) emphasized the application of quantitative methods to risk management.
  5. Crouhy, Galai, and Mark (2001, 2006) are two solid risk management references for practitioners working at international banks with special attention given to the regulatory framework.
  6. Jorion (2007) gave an overview of the practice of risk management through information on banking regulations, a careful analysis of financial disasters, and an analysis of risk management pitfalls. He also made a strong case for the use of value-at-risk-based risk measurement and illustrated several applications and refinements of the value-at-risk methodology.
  7. Finally, Bernstein (1996) is another key reference. This masterpiece gives a vibrant account of the history of the concept of risk from antiquity to modern days.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details