International Research Journal of Commerce , Arts and Science

 ( Online- ISSN 2319 - 9202 )     New DOI : 10.32804/CASIRJ

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 55    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

PROCESS OF LAW-MAKING AND BUDGETARY PROCEEDINGS IN RUSSIA: POSITION OF THE STATE DUMA

    1 Author(s):  ANKUR YADAV

Vol -  7, Issue- 6 ,         Page(s) : 113 - 120  (2016 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/CASIRJ

Abstract

The State Duma is the primary legislative body of the Russian political system. But the right to legislative initiation is not its sole domain. The right of legislative initiation can be excerices by the various other agencies. According to article 104 of the Constitution, the President of the Russian Federation, the Federation Council, the members to the Federation Council, the deputies to the State Duma, the Government of the Russian Federation and the legislative (representative) bodies of the subjects of the Russian Federation, have the right of legislative initiative. The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court of Arbitration of the Russian Federation also enjoy the right of legislative initiative within their jurisdiction.

  1. *Indicates Primary Resource 
  2. Badan, Phool (2000), “An Analysis of Russian Parliamentary (State Duma) Elections- 1999”, Journal of Peace Studies, Vol.7 Issue 2- March-April.
  3. Chasty, Paul and Jeffrey Gleisner (2000); “The Consolidation of Russian Parliamentarism: The State Duma 1993-1998” in Neil Robinson (eds.) Institution of Political Change in Russia, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
  4. Chaisty, Paul and Petra Schleiter (2002), “Productive but Not Valued: The Russian State Duma- 1994-2001”, East- Europe Studies, 54(5).
  5. Chenoy, Anuradha M. (1992), “Systematic Change and Systematic Collapse”, Seminar: May
  6. Chenoy, Anuradha M. (2001), The Making of New Russia, New Delhi: Har Anand Publication.
  7. Clark, Terry D. (1994), “The Russian Elections: Back to Square One?”, Political Science and Politics, 27(3), September.
  8. * The Constitution of the Russian Federation (as adopted in 1993) <departments.bucknell.edu/Russian/const/constit.html>.
  9. Dash, P. L. (1999), “Russia: Twilight of Yeltsin Years”, Economic and Political Weekly, 34(37), September.
  10. Depoy, Erik (1996); “Boris Yeltsin and the 1996 Russian Presidential Election”, Presidential Studies Quarterly, 26(4)
  11. Desai, Padma (2005), “Russian Retrospectives on Reforms from Yeltsin to Putin”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), Winter.
  12. Gidadhubli, R. G. (1998), “Yeltsin's 'New Shock Therapy': Russia Back to Political Uncertainty”, Economic and Political Weekly, 33(18), May.
  13. Gorenburg and Gaffney (2004), “Great Promise Unfulfilled: How Russia lost its way after Independence”, <csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/ruseur_wp-026.pdf>
  14. Hesli, Vicki L. (2003); “Parliamentary and Presidential Election in Russia: The Political Landscape in 1999 and 2000” in Vicki L. Hesli and William M. Reisinger (eds) The 1999-2000 Election in Russia: Their Impact and Legacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Holmes, Stephen (1994), “Superpresidentialism and its Problems”, East- European Constitutional Review, Winter: 2(4).
  16. Huskey, Eugena (1999); Presidential Power in Russia, NY: ME Sharpe.
  17. McFaul, Michael (2000), “Yeltsin's Legacy”, The Wilson Quarterly, 24(2)- Spring.
  18. Mohanty, Arun (2010), Evolution of Parliamentarism in Post- Soviet Russia, New Delhi: Axis Publication.
  19. O’Donnell, Guillermo (1998), “Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies”, Journal of Democracy, 9(3).
  20. * Official website of the Russian government <government.ru/eng/>
  21. Ostrow, Joel (1998), “Procedural Breakdown and Deadlock in the Russian State Duma: The Problems of an Unlinked Duel Channel Institutional Design”, Europe- Asia Studies, 50(5).
  22. Ostrow, Joel (2000), Comparing Post- Soviet Legislatures, Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
  23. Parrish, Scott (1998), “Presidential Decree Authority in Russia, 1991-1995” in Matthew S.Shugart, and John M. Carey (eds) Executive Decree Authority, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Remington, Thomas F., Steven S. Smith and Moshe Haspel (1998), “Decrees, Laws, and Inter- Branch Relations in Russian Federation”, Post- Soviet Affairs: 14(4) 
  25. Remington, Thomas F. (2000), “Putin’s Agenda”, The Brown Journal of World Affairs, Winter/Spring- 7(1).
  26. Remington, Thomas F. (2001), “Putin and the Duma”, Post-Soviet Affairs, 17(4).
  27. Rose, Richard, Evgeny Tikhomirov and William Mishler (1997), “Understanding Multi-Party Choice: The 1995 Duma Election”, Europe-Asia Studies: 49(5), July.
  28. Sakwa, Richard (2002) (3rd Edition), Russian Politics and Society, London: New York: Routledge.
  29. Shevchenko, Iulia and Grigorii V. Golosov (2001), “Legislative Activism of Russian Duma Deputies, 1996-1999”, Europe- Asia Studies, March, 53(2).
  30. Shugart, Matthew S. and John M. Carey (1992), Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  31. Tompson, William (2002), “Putin's Challenge: The Politics of Structural Reform in Russia”, Europe-Asia Studies, 54(6) – September.
  32. Treisman, Daniel (1996), “Why Yeltsin Won?”, Foreign Affairs, 75(5)- September- October.
  33. Troxel, Tiffany A. (2003), Parliamentary Power in Russia, 1994- 2001: President Vs Parliament, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details