International Research Journal of Commerce , Arts and Science

 ( Online- ISSN 2319 - 9202 )     New DOI : 10.32804/CASIRJ

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 142    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

CONCEPT OF DISABILITY – THE DYNAMIC TREND

    1 Author(s):  DR. SUJOY KANTI GHOSHAL

Vol -  9, Issue- 4 ,         Page(s) : 233 - 245  (2018 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/CASIRJ

Abstract

Concept of disability is vital. Unfortunately, there are no universally accepted ways to define disability and to measure it. However, consensus on a definition would enhance evaluation and research. Disability is a dynamic phenomenon. Concept and understanding of human disability are observed to be undergoing continuous modification and consequently administrative attention across the world. Unquestionably, defining disability is a challenging task. However, the international agencies WHO, ILO, UNESCO and UN, have played a valuable role in facilitating the development of definition of disability. Disability is complex, dynamic, multidimensional, and contested. In India, disability condition has been introduced essentially following the medical model. In common parlance, different terms such as disabled, handicapped, crippled, physically challenged, are used inter-changeably, indicating noticeably the emphasis on pathologic conditions. Even so, disability is not defined as a standalone medical condition, but rather as the product of the interaction between the environment broadly defined and the health condition of particular persons.

  1. Altman, B. M. (2001), Disability Definitions, Models, Classification Schemes, and Applications.
  2. Barnes, C. (1991), Disabled people in Britain and discrimination. London, Hurst.
  3. Bhushan Shashi et al. (1998), The situation of the handicapped in India. Institute of Social Studies. New Delhi.
  4. Chaudhuri, L. (2006), Disability in India Issues and Concerns, eSS Conference Paper.
  5. Coleridge, P. (1993), Disability, Liberation and Development. London: Oxfam Publications.
  6. Dalal A.K. (2006), Social interventions to moderate discriminatory attitudes: the case of the physically challenged in India. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 11:374-382. doi:10.1080/13548500600595392 PMID:17130074
  7. Mitra, S. (2006), The capability approach and disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16:236-247. doi: 10.1177/10442073 060160040501
  8. Mishra, A.K., Gupta, R. (2006), Disability index: a measure of deprivation among the disabled. Economic and Political Weekly, 41:4026-4029.
  9. Sen, A. (2009), The idea of justice. Cambridge, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  10. United Nations (2003), Standard rules on the equalization of opportunities of persons with disabilities. New York.
  11. World Bank (2009), People with disabilities in India: from commitments to outcomes. Washington, World Bank.
  12. World Health Organization, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, International Labour Organization, International Disability and Development Consortium (2010), Community-based rehabilitation: CBR guidelines. Geneva, World Health Organization.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details