International Research Journal of Commerce , Arts and Science

 ( Online- ISSN 2319 - 9202 )     New DOI : 10.32804/CASIRJ

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 29    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

A STUDY OF COST EFFECTIVE MEASURES THROUGH RECYCLING OF WASTE MANAGEMENT”: A CASE STUDY OF MCD

    1 Author(s):  RAMESH CHAND

Vol -  5, Issue- 3 ,         Page(s) : 247 - 252  (2014 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/CASIRJ

Abstract

Recycling can benefit community and the environment. “Reduce, reuse, recycle” is the mantra we often hear every time there’s a discussion about recycling. Reducing waste means not only to reduce the volume of waste that goes to the landfills, but it also means decreasing the amount of dangerous chemicals that seep into the soil and pollute the air due to improper waste disposal. The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of current methods for reusing and recycling construction and demolition (C&D) waste materials. Construction and demolition practices are also examined along with policies and legislation influencing C&D waste management. This thesis examines many of the waste materials produced by the Industrial, Commercial & Institutional sector. A particular effort was made to describe C&D waste recycling methods which are not widely practiced.

order s online

  1. Ablett, J.; Baijal, A.; Beinhocker, E.; Bose, A.; Farrell, D.; Gersch, U.; Greenberg, E.; Gupta, S.; Gupta, S. 2007. The ‘Bird of Gold’: The Rise of India’s Consumer Market. May 2007 Report. McKinsey Global Institute [MGI].
  2. ABS. 2005. Annual Report 2005-06. http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/0407DA584588E138CA25720300182FBA/$File/10010_2005-06.pdf
  3. ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics). 2006. Water Account Australia. Report no. 4610.0. Latest issue released 11.30 am (Canberra Time) 28 November 2006. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Commonwealth of Australia  http:// www.abs.gov.au.
  4. ACIL Tasman Pty Ltd. 2005. Economics Policy Strategy. Research into access to recycled water and impediments to recycled water investment. Report prepared for the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry on behalf of the Natural Resource Policy and Programs Committee. June 2005, pp. 1-82. Agodzo, S. K.; Huibers, F.; Chenini, F.; van Lier, J. B.; Duran, A. 2003. Use of Wastewater in irrigated agriculture. Country studies from Bolivia, Ghana and Tunisia, Vol. 2 (Ghana). WUR, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  5. Allison, L.; Tierney, J.; Lundy, K.; Mackay, S.; Tchen, T.; Wong, P. 2002. The value of water: inquiry into Australia’s management o urban water. Report of the Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and Arts Reference Committee, Parliament of Australia, Canberra, ACT. http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/ecita_ctte/ water/report
  6. Angyal, A. 1941. Disgust and related aversions. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 36: 393-412.
  7. ANZECC, ARMCANZ, NHMRC. 2000a. Guidelines for Sewerage Systems: reclaimed water. Paper No. 14. Australia and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand. Australia and New Zealand. National Water Quality Management Strategy. http:// www.deh.gov.au/water/quality/nwqms/
  8. ANZECC, ARMCANZ, NHMRC. 2000b. Guidelines for Sewerage Systems: effluent management. Paper No. 11. Australia and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand. Australia and New Zealand. National Water Quality Management Strategy. http://www.deh.gov.au/water/quality/nwqms/
  9. ARCWIS (Australian Research Centre for Water in Society). 2002. Perth domestic water use study Household appliance ownership and Community attitudinal analysis. 1999-2000. Sydney: CSIRO Urban Water Programme.
  10. ARRIS Pty Ltd. 2004. Quality Assurance Programs and Growing Crops with Recycled Water. Brochure funded by Horticulture Australia Ltd.
  11. Bradford, A.; Brook, R.; Hunshal, C. S. 2003. Wastewater irrigation in Hubli–Dharwad, India: Implications for health and livelihoods. Environment and Urbanization 15(2): 157-170.
  12. Bruvold, W. 1988. Public opinion on water reuse options. Journal WPCF 60(1): 45-49.
  13. Buechler, S.; Mekala, G. D.; Raschid-Sally, L. 2002. Livelihoods and Wastewater Irrigated Agriculture along the Musi River in Hyderabad City, Andhra Pradesh, India. Urban Agriculture Magazine 8: 14-17.
  14. Buechler, S.; Mekala, G. D. 2003. Wastewater as a Source of Multiple Livelihoods? A Study in Rural Andhra Pradesh, South India. In: Devi, R.; Ahsan, N. (Eds.), Water and Wastewater: Perspectives of Developing Countries. London, UK: International Water Association.
  15. Buechler, S.; Mekala, G. D. 2005. Household Food Security and Wastewater-dependent Livelihood Activities Along the Musi River in Andhra Pradesh, India. Internet publication. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/wastewater/ gwwufoodsecurity.pdf
  16. Buechler, S.; Mekala, G. D. Highlighting the User in Wastewater Research: Gender, Caste and Class in the Study of Wastewater-dependent Livelihoods in Hyderabad, India. In: Ahmed, S.; Gautam, S. R.; Zwarteveen, M. (eds.), Engendering Integrated Water Management in South Asia: Policy, Practice and Institutions. New Delhi: Sage Press. Forthcoming.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details