International Research Journal of Commerce , Arts and Science

 ( Online- ISSN 2319 - 9202 )     New DOI : 10.32804/CASIRJ

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 34    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

AN ANALYTICAL STUDY ON BRANDING WITH IT PRODUCTS

    1 Author(s):  ANITA

Vol -  3, Issue- 2 ,         Page(s) : 87 - 98  (2012 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/CASIRJ

Abstract

Consumers choice of private brands reflects distinct differences in terms of product categories, and indications are that demographic and psychographic factors are also influential in terms of the sales of private vs. national brand foods. This study investigated the relationship between selected demographic and psychographic variables and consumers' brand preferences for selected food products in a South African context. Findings revealed that consumers' choice of private brands is probably associated with the product category. This study concluded that brand preference depends on specific demographics for each IT company’s product. Brand preference research therefore seems to be product and region specific and related to specific demographic variables.

1. Berry, S. (1994), ‘Estimating discrete choice models of product di?erentiation’, RAND Journal of Economics 25, 242–262.
2. Berry, S., J. Levinsohn and A. Pakes (1995), ‘Automobile prices in market equilibrium’, Econometrica 63, 841–889.
3. Berry, S., J. Levinsohn and A. Pakes (2001), ‘Di?erentiated products demand system from a combination of micro and macro data: The new car market’, Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.
4. Bhat, C. (2001), ‘Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model’, Transportation Research B 35, 677–693.
5. Blundell, R. and J. Powell (2001), ‘Endogeneity in semiparametric binary response models’, Working Paper, Department of Economics, University College London.
6. Bresnahan, T. (1997), ‘The apple-cinnamon cheerios war: Valuing new goods, identifying market power, and economic measurement’, Working Paper, Stanford University.
7. Brownstone, D. and K. Train (1999), ‘Forecasting new product penetration with ?exible substitution patterns’, Journal of Econometrics 89, 109– 129.
8. Crawford, G. (2000), ‘The impact of the 1992 cable act on household demand and welfare’, RAND Journal of Economics 31, 422–449.
9. Goolsbee, A. and A. Petrin (2002), ‘The consumer gains from direct broadcast satellites and the  competition with cable tv’, Working Paper, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago.
10. Halton, J. (1960), ‘On the e?ciency of evaluating certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multi-dimensional integrals’, Numerische Mathematik 2, 84–90.
11. Hausman, J. (1978), ‘Speci?cation tests in econometrics’, Econometrica 46, 1251–1272.
12. Hausman, J. (1997a), ‘Reply to professor bresnahan’, Working Paper, MIT.
13. McFadden, D. (1974), Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, in P.Zarembka, ed., ‘Frontiers in Econometrics’, Academic Press, New York, pp. 105–42.
14. Munizaga, M. and R. Alvarez-Daziano (2001), ‘Mixed logit versus nested logit and probit’, Working Paper, Departmento de Ingeniera Civil, Universidad de Chile.
15. Nevo, A. (2001), ‘Measuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industry’, Econometrica 69, 307–342.
16. Petrin, A. (2002), ‘Quantifying the bene?ts of new products; the case of the minivan’, Journal of Political Economy 110, 705–729.
17. Smith, R. and R. Blundell (1986), ‘An exogeneity test for a simultaneous equation tobit model with an application to labor supply’, Econometrica 54, 679–686.
18. Train, K. (1986), Qualitative Choice Analysis, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
19. Train, K. (1998), ‘Recreation demand models with taste variation’, Land Economics 74, 230–239.
20. Train, K. (2000), ‘Halton sequences for mixed logit’, Working Paper No. E00-278, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
21. Train, K. (2002), Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press, New York.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details