International Research Journal of Commerce , Arts and Science

 ( Online- ISSN 2319 - 9202 )     New DOI : 10.32804/CASIRJ

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 27    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

THE PATH TO QUALITIY TEACHING METHOD IN HIGHER EDUCATION

    1 Author(s):  ARUN KUMAR MISHRA

Vol -  8, Issue- 3 ,         Page(s) : 44 - 49  (2017 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/CASIRJ

Abstract

There has been extensive research in the last few years on adapting teaching to differences among learners, on the social and institutional context of teaching in higher education and, more recently, on the theory and methods of research on teaching. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of various teaching methods used for teaching students for higher education. This review of literature on Quality Teaching aims to provide a theoretical background to the quality of teaching in Higher Education. It highlights the main debates on the topic to date, hoping to present the different perspectives that exist on the topic of quality in teaching. The review of the literature is organized in three main parts as to address three major questions: 1) “What is Quality Teaching and why is it important in higher education?” 2) “How can teaching concretely be enhanced?” 3) “How can one make sure Quality Teaching initiatives are effective?”

  1. Arreola, R. A. (1995). Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
  2. Benson, L., Schroeder, P., Lantz, C., and Bird, M. (n.d.). Student Perceptions Of Effective Professors. Retrieved July 24, 2009
  3. Braskamp, L. A., &Ory, J. C. (1994). Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and instructional performance. San Francisco, CA:
  4. Jossey- Bass.Centra, J. A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Chang, T.S. (2001). The effect of system administration on faculty attitudes toward student ratings. Hualien, Taiwan: National Hualien Teachers College. 
  6. Cohen, P. A. (1981). Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta- Analysis of Multisection Validity Studies. Review of Educational Research. 51, 281-309. 
  7. Davis. B. G. (1993). Tools for Teaching. Jossey- Bass Publishers: San Francisco. Seldin, P. (1999). Changing Practices in Evaluating Teaching. Bolton, Mass: Anker.
  8. Shea, A. (2009). Making the Grade: College Teaching. Retrieved October23, 2009.
  9. Singh, U.K and Sudarshan, K.N. (2005).Teacher
  10. Education. New Delhi: Discovery Publishing House. 

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details