1. See Henri Flucher, "Measure for Measure", Shakespeare and His Critics, ed. F.E. Halliday (London: Gerald Duckworth and Co. Ltd., 1958), p. 241.
2. Eileen Mackay, "Measure for Measure", Shakespeare Quarterly (Spring, 1963), p. 109.
3. D.R.C. Marsh, "The Mood of Measure for Measure", Shakespeare Quarterly (Winter, 1963), p. 38.Eileen Mackay, p. 109.Ibid.
4. See Oscar James Campbell, "Measure for Measure", Shakespeare's Satire (New York: Oxford University Press, 1945), p. 122.
5. Anna Jameson, Shakespeare's Heroines (London: George Bell and Sons, 1897), p. 15-16.
6. Cited by Christina Malcolmson, "Book Reviews", Shakespeare Quarterly (Volume 56, No 1, 2005), p. 110.
7. Cited by Sarup Singh, "The Debate on Chastity", The Double Standard in Shakespeare and Related Essays (Delhi: Konark Publishers Pvt. Ltd., 1988),p.1.
8. Valerie Traub, "Gender and Sexuality in Shakespeare", The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare ed. Margreta de Grazia and Stanley Wells (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), p. 129.
9. Maria Lugones, "Playfulness, 'World' - Travelling and Loving Perception", Feminist Social Thought: A Reader, ed. Diana Tietjens Meyers (London: Routledge, 1997), p. 150.
10. Marydass, "Problem Plays of Shakespeare", A Compendium of Shakespeare, (New Delhi: Sterling Publishers Private Limited, 1987), p. 62.Ibid., p. 63.
11. Stanley Wells, "'I think he loves the world Only for himself' Men loving men in Shakespeare's Plays", Looking for Sex in Shakespeare (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 68.
12. William Shakespeare, Measure For Measure edited by Brian Gibbons, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).